|
|
|
Draft Discussion
Document
Foster
Parent Registration Board
The task of the proposed
Foster Parent Registration Board would be to determine Authority policy
on all matters
relating to the registration
and re-registration of foster parents. This would include such matters
as:
Foster
Parent Registration Authority Hearings Tribunal
The task of the proposed
Foster Parent Registration Authority Hearings Tribunal would be to hear
and determine matters of foster parent discipline within the framework
of standards and ethics prescribed by the Foster Parent Registration Authority,
having regard to matters of law. The Tribunal will be the final arbiter
in matters brought before it.
The three members of the
Tribunal would be appointed by the Minister and would include a person
with the qualifications to be appointed as a judge, as President.
Members of the Tribunal
would be precluded from concurrently serving as members of the Board.
Tenure for Tribunal members
and the President would be for a period of three years.
Registrar:
The Registrar would be
the chief executive officer and general manager of the proposed New Zealand
Foster Parent Registration Authority. The Registrar would report to the
Board and would operate within the framework of Board policy and the
determinations
of the Tribunal.
The Registrar will be an
ex-officio member of the Board.
The Registrar would advise
the Board on the development of policy in all matters relating to foster
parent registration.
The Registrars role would
include liaison with foster parent training institutions and the implementation
of Board policy about qualification requirements for registration.
Registration
Branch
The task of registering
and maintaining the registration of New Zealand foster parents within the
framework of Board policy would be the responsibility of the Registrar,
through the Registration Branch.
This would include criminal
record checks, verification of qualifications, conducting interviews to
determine suitability, and monitoring and verification of professional
development. Individual cases for which there is no existing policy would
be taken to the Board by the Registrar for determination.
The proposal for a Foster
Parent Registration Authority might also include responsibility for undertaking
full probity checks for all foster parents in all agencies, government
and non-government, without exception.
Further, it may be necessary
for all non-fostering staff in all agencies to be subject to full probity
checks by the Foster Parent Registration Authority or some other appropriate
body. Such a checking system should be fully integrated into a
whole-of-government
probity checking system, given that there is significant mobility between
fostering and other related fields, such as community services and health
care.
This would be taken into
account by the Government if foster parent registration was agreed to.
Investigations
Branch
The investigation of incompetent
fostering and improper conduct, as defined by Board policy, would be undertaken
by the Registrar through the Investigations Branch.
The investigative staff
would all be trained specialists independent of any employing authority.
It is anticipated that investigative case work would deal primarily with
referrals concerning alleged incompetence as a foster parent.
However, the branch would
also fulfil the function of the case management unit in so far as that
unit deals with allegations of improper conduct. The branchs tasks would
include investigation, liaison with other agencies, maintenance of a data
base and maintenance of the not-to-be-employed list for all agencies.
Procedure
for handling allegations of foster parent incompetence
In the proposal, the employer
of a foster parent whose competence is in question would write to the Registrar
of the Foster Parent Registration Authority formally requesting a review
of the foster parents registration. The employer would give the foster
parent a copy of the letter and information provided by the Board about
the procedure for handling allegations of foster parent incompetence. In
the model, the employer must be satisfied that there is proper evidence
to justify referring the case to the Authority.
The Tribunal will have
powers to declare unjustified referrals by employers to be vexatious.
The employer would be required
to provide to the Registrar:
substantial
evidence of incompetence in the present or previous placements
evidence
of reasonable attempts by the principal or previous principals to assist
the foster parent overcome the areas of alleged incompetence.
If the Registrar is convinced
that the evidence provides adequate grounds for doing so, a contracted
officer from the Investigations Branch would conduct an investigation.
The nature of the investigation would be appropriate to the allegation
and may involve all or some of the following:
Procedure for handling allegations of improper conduct
While the Investigations
Branchs case load would be primarily concerned with matters of foster
parent competence, a small number of referrals in any one year may relate
to allegations of improper conduct by foster parent.
The New Zealand Child Protection
Guidelines apply to all employers of foster parents. Cases referred to
the CYPFS in accordance with those guidelines, but subsequently not investigated
by CYPFS or Police, would come back in the proposed model for action by
the employer as possible improper conduct of a sexual nature by a foster
parent.
The employer would be able
to refer the allegations to the Foster Parent Registration Authority for
investigation and determination, and would decide whether the foster parent
should remain fostering during this process.
In the proposal, referral
of all allegations of improper conduct of a sexual nature by a foster parent
to the Foster Parent Registration Authority would be mandatory for all
agencies.
An investigation would
be carried out by an officer from the Investigations Branch of the Authority,
who will report to the Registrar.
Having regard to Board
policy, and to precedents established by previous judgements of the Tribunal,
the Registrar would decide whether to recommend to the Tribunal that:
registration
be withdrawn
the
foster parent be formally reprimanded if the conduct is determined as
inappropriate
rather than improper, and given conditional registration for a specified
period subject to a further report by the employer or, if so determined
by the Registrar, a second and final investigation found no improper conduct
occurred, in which case no action would be taken.
In the proposal, the Registrar
would advise the foster parent of the decision to so recommend to the Foster
Parent Registration Authority Hearings Tribunal, and that the foster parent
has fourteen days in which to appeal to the Tribunal against the recommendation.
Having heard any appeal, the Tribunal would determine the matter.
The names of foster parents
who have been refused registration or deregistered on the grounds of improper
conduct of a sexual nature would be retained by the Authority on a
not-to-be-employed
list.
Employers would be able
to refer the names of applicants for fostering positions to the Authority
to be checked against this list.
Employers would also be
able to refer allegations of improper conduct other than that of a sexual
nature directly to the Authority. The Boards code of ethics and professional
standards will be the reference for any investigation arising from the
referral.
Initial
registration
In its first year of operation, all foster parents residing in New Zealand or
resident in other countries
but who wish to be registered in New Zealand would be eligible to apply
for registration by the proposed New Zealand Foster Parent Registration
Authority. Depending on the outcomes of the consultative process commencing
with this discussion paper, registration of foster parents could commence
from 1 Jan 2000.
Initial registration would
be automatic for permanent and approved foster parents in New Zealand
The application fee would
not apply.
Foster parents in New Zealand
non-government systems and agencies would be able to apply for registration
directly or through their employer. Given that a criminal record check
would be part of the registration process, initial registration would be
granted to these foster parents subject to a satisfactory criminal record
check. There would be no application fee.
Graduates of New Zealand
foster parent education courses in 1999 but who have not been employed
as a foster parent since completion of training would be able to apply
for registration. The application fee would not be required.
Foster parents resident
in New Zealand but not currently employed in fostering would be able to
apply directly to the Authority for registration. The application fee would
apply.
Foster parents and graduates
of foster parent education courses in other countries who have not fostered
would be able to apply for registration. Registration would include a
satisfactory
criminal record check. The application fee would apply.
The granting of registration
would be the responsibility of the Registrar. An applicant whose application
was declined would be advised in writing of the Registrars decision, stating
the reasons for registration not being granted.
There would be fourteen
days in which to appeal to the Tribunal against the Registrars decision.
Types
of registration
When fully operational,
the proposed New Zealand Foster Parent Registration Authority would offer
two types of foster parent registration:
standard
registration for foster parents who have met
the
criteria determined by the Board
conditional
registration for a specified period,
determined
by the Registrar following an investigation.
In the proposal it will
be possible to give conditional registration following an investigation
related to incompetence or inappropriate behaviour.
It would not be given where
the Registrar determines that the foster parents conduct constitutes child
sexual assault.
Fees
If it is decided to introduce
a system of foster parent registration along the lines of the proposal
canvassed in this paper, the Government would provide seeding funding for
the initial establishment of the proposed Authority to ensure that it provides
a quality registration service for the profession from the beginning.
When fully operational
the Authority would be self-funding through application and registration
fees. One of the responsibilities of the Board would be to ensure that
these fees were maintained at a minimum level consistent with the effective
operation of the Authority.
It is likely that the registration
fee would be approximately $52 per annum, or about $1.00 per week, with
a $50 application fee for those applying for registration.
The application fee would
not apply to foster parents employed in New Zealand agencies at the time
of the Authoritys commencement.
Part of the cost could
be offset by agencies and systems requiring fewer resources to undertake
what would be done by the proposed Authority.
Welfare agencies and systems
would need to be assured that the Authoritys processes were of sufficient
rigour and consistency that their own processes could be reduced or replaced.
Identification of these
offsets would enable a lower fee structure.
Registration
of Members of Professions
FOSTERING
The concept of professional
registration is a well established one. In various forms it applies to
many professions which practise in New Zealand.
In whichever way it is
managed, registration of professionals is usually concerned with some or
all of the following:
Foster
Parent Registration
The idea of foster parent
registration is a well-established one and exists in a variety of forms
in some other countries.
In general,
models of foster parent registration are concerned with:
ensuring the quality of fostering education
ensuring suitability for the profession
the maintenance of professional standards and
ethical behaviour.
Recognition
of qualifications
There is a well established
and direct relationship between the quality of initial foster parent education
and the quality of fostering. At national level in New Zealand there have
been initiatives to guide and influence the development and implementation
of foster parent education courses but they have not had mandatory status.
Some models of foster parent registration include the accreditation of
fostering education programs as part of the registration authoritys
responsibilities.
In New Zealand, providers
of foster parent education are autonomous institutions and there is no
formal accreditation process external to the institutions.
The New Zealands Foster
Parent Qualifications Advisory Panel would endorse university fostering
education courses for employment purposes with all welfare Agencies. However,
participation by the universities is not mandatory and in the non-government
sector there is no formal system for endorsement of foster parent education
programs.
Across agencies and systems
in New Zealand there are differing standards for the profession in terms
of qualification requirements.
There is no minimum qualification requirement
in the non-government sector, with agencies and systems having a variety
of approaches.
Qualifications for employment with Welfare Agencies include specified;
Maintaining
professional skills
Key aspects of foster parent
registration relate to ensuring, maintaining and improving fostering
performance.
While
substantial professional development opportunities are offered across all
agencies and systems in New Zealand, it is not mandatory for foster parents
to upgrade their knowledge and skills.
In
this regard fostering stands apart from those professions which have specified
requirements about regularly maintaining and upgrading knowledge and skills.
In such professions, fulfilling
these requirements is necessary to retain the right to practise as a member
of the profession.
A system of foster parent registration has the potential to provide a stronger
guarantee of the quality of the New Zealand fostering profession by making
re-registration contingent upon evidence of regular updating of knowledge
and skills.
Guaranteeing
professional standards and conduct
Models of registration
in fostering and other professions often include a capacity for responding
to those who fail to meet certain standards in their professional practice
or conduct.
This generally is done
through an investigatory, disciplinary and appeals process. In this regard,
agencies and systems
in New Zealand are characterised
by a great variety of approaches and processes. This includes processes
which are highly formalised and often excessively time consuming, processes
which are guided by industrially registered grievance and dispute resolution
procedures, and relatively informal processes.
In this, as in other areas,
there is no consistency for the profession in New Zealand. A result of
this lack of consistency is that different standards apply for people who
are engaged in essentially the same work.
Foster
Care Program
Foster Care is a protective
service for abused and/or neglected children, ages 0-17, who come from
all ethnic, social and economic backgrounds. The primary goal of foster
care is to reunite families or to ensure the child will leave foster care
for a permanent placement. Until that time these children are in need of
temporary substitute family care.
Foster
Parents
are single or married, with or without children
are adults, age 21 or over
are needed from all economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds
are in good physical and emotional health
have a good stable home
have the ability to love and let go
have the ability to work as members of professional teams
and
can demonstrate competencies
in the following:
Foster
Care Services
The Welfare Services have
several types of foster care. The following is a brief description and
requirements for each type of foster care.
Foster Care
Respite Foster Care
Behavioural
Foster Care
Approving and Administering standards
All qualifications on the
Framework are composed of registered standards - statements that describe
what a learner knows or can do.
The concept of assessing
and measuring against standards is not new. A metre ruler is accepted as
being a metre in length because it is bench marked to a standard resting
in Paris. A manufactured product carrying a national Standards mark is
considered to be of high quality because it has been assessed as having
met a rigorous set of specifications created by experts in that particular
field. In a similar way, standards on the National Qualifications Framework
are the accepted benchmarks against which an individuals learning performance
can be assessed and reported on.
Standards are learning
outcomes. Having qualifications based on learning outcomes is what makes
Framework qualifications different from other qualifications systems (which
are often focused more on outputs such as courses, or inputs such as curricula
or teaching hours). Outcomes models have been endorsed by international
bodies involved with funding education systems (eg. the World Bank, Asian
Development Bank and the OECD).
The Framework is built
on a process of consensus. Standards are drafted by expert groups (engineers
for engineering standards, geographers for geography standards and so on).
The draft standards are then circulated to stake holders for comment and
contribution. Once standards are agreed to and registered, they are subject
to review by stake holders and experts on a regular basis. This allows
for standards to be refined and updated over time.
Each registered standard
has a defined credit value and sits at a specified level on the Framework.
Credits may be accumulated from different learning institutions or workplaces
towards a single qualification without the cumbersome exemption arrangements
required in the past: all organisations accredited to assess against standards
recognise Framework credits awarded by others.
Eight
Levels of Progression
The Framework has eight
levels of progression.
Standards-Setting
Bodies
The expert groups which
set standards and take part in the accreditation of education and training
providers are known as standards-setting bodies (SSBs), National Standards
Bodies (NSBs), Industry Training Organisations (ITOs), Standards
Implementation
Bodies (SIBs), or advisory groups. NSBs represent learning areas eg:
science, history, philosophy, while ITOs represent industries eg. forestry,
manufacturing, tourism. The most common generic term used is SSB.
Accredited
Organisations
Only accredited organisations
are able to assess learners against Framework standards, and award credits.
Accreditation means an education provider or workplace has sufficient expertise
in teaching and assessing, and adequate quality management systems to deliver
what is promised to the learner.
It is the organisation
which is accredited, not its programmes.
The Framework system gives
education and training providers much freedom to develop their own
programmes.
The standards state the outcomes which programmes should generate, not
how they must be learned or assessed. Education and training programmes
can be designed in whatever size or form is appropriate to the learners
and the organisation. This flexibility leads to new types of learning and
a range of assessment opportunities. These give learners greater access
to learning and enable providers to use resources more effectively.
Assessments
by an Accredited Provider
Assessment can be done
by the representative of an accredited provider (a school, private training
establishment, wananga, government training establishment or a tertiary
institution) or by a registered assessor. Registered assessors are individuals
registered by an Industry Training Organisation (ITO) or National Standards
Body (NSB) to assess within their area of responsibility.
A wide range
of evidence may be used to compare a candidates performance against a
standard as part of the assessment process.
As well as traditional
tests, projects etc, an assessor can use evidence of prior achievements
or evidence from the candidates workplace to test performance against
a standard.
Moderation
Methods
Consistency among assessors
is gained through moderation processes which ensure that assessors have
a common view on what meeting the standard means. Moderation methods
include assessor training, regional panels, moderator visits, examples
of learner work and common assessment tasks.
Record
of Learning
Once a learner is assessed
and awarded credit, the learning institution notifies NZQA and the credit
is then added to the NZQA database along with other credits achieved by
the learner.
Once a year, or more often
if requested, the learner receives a record of all standards and qualifications
he or she has achieved in the past year. This is called the Record of Learning
and is an official document, useful as a credential to future employers
or education providers.
FOSTER PARENT TRAINING DETAILS
TRAINING INFORMATION
Registration Number:..-----------------------------------------------
Name of LICENSED foster parent who attended training:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Date(s) of Training:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Training Course Title:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
City Name Where Training Was Held:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
First and Last Name of Presenter/Speaker:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Who Held Training:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Hours Completed
(for this course ONLY):
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact (Name) and Phone # to verify:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorised Signature:
-----------------------------------------
Sex of children who may receive care:
Age of children who may receive care:
Certified to Level of Care
Registration Number:
Authorised Signature